CombinatorialCase001: Difference between revisions

From NARS2000
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 130: Line 130:
As shown in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelvefold_way#case_fnx Wikipedia], <apll>(L+R)PN R ↔ +/L PN¨0..R</apll>.
As shown in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelvefold_way#case_fnx Wikipedia], <apll>(L+R)PN R ↔ +/L PN¨0..R</apll>.


Because partitions of <apll>L</apll> into <apll>R</apll> non-negative parts (<apll>001</apll>) is the same as partitions of <apll>L+R</apll> into <apll>R</apll> positive parts (<apll>002</apll>), these cases are related by the following identity:
Because partitions of <apll>L</apll> into <apll>R</apll> non-negative parts ([[CombinatorialCase001|<apll>001</apll>]]) is the same as partitions of <apll>L+R</apll> into <apll>R</apll> positive parts ([[CombinatorialCase002|<apll>002</apll>]]), these cases are related by the following identity:


<apll>001 1‼L R ↔ (⊂[⎕IO+1] ¯1+002 1‼(L+R) R)~¨0</apll>
<apll>001 1‼L R ↔ (⊂[⎕IO+1] ¯1+002 1‼(L+R) R)~¨0</apll>

Revision as of 20:53, 29 April 2017

This case produces the Partitions of the number L into at most R parts.

  • L unlabeled balls (0), R unlabeled boxes (0), any # of balls per box (1)
  • Not ⎕IO-sensitive
  • Counted result is an integer scalar
  • Generated result is a nested vector of integer vectors.

The count for this function is (L+R)PN R where L PN R calculates the number of Partitions of the number L into exactly R parts.

For example:

If we have 6 unlabeled balls (●●●●●●) and 3 unlabeled boxes with any # of balls per box, there are 7 (↔ (6+3)PN 3) ways to meet these criteria:






       
     
 




 
 
 
 
 
   
     
 
 



 
 
 
 

   
     
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 


 
 
 


   
     
 
 
 


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

     

The diagram above corresponds to the nested array

      ⍪001 1‼6 3
 6
 5 1
 4 2
 4 1 1
 3 3
 3 2 1
 2 2 2
      ⍝ Partitions of L into at most R parts
      ⍝ Unlabeled balls & boxes, any #bpb
      ⍪001 1‼5 5
 5
 4 1
 3 2
 3 1 1
 2 2 1
 2 1 1 1
 1 1 1 1 1
      ⍪001 1‼5 4
 5
 4 1
 3 2
 3 1 1
 2 2 1
 2 1 1 1
      ⍪001 1‼5 3
 5
 4 1
 3 2
 3 1 1
 2 2 1
      ⍪001 1‼5 2
 5
 4 1
 3 2
      ⍪001 1‼5 1
 5

Identities

As shown in Wikipedia, (L+R)PN R ↔ +/L PN¨0..R.

Because partitions of L into R non-negative parts (001) is the same as partitions of L+R into R positive parts (002), these cases are related by the following identity:

001 1‼L R ↔ (⊂[⎕IO+1] ¯1+002 1‼(L+R) R)~¨0