Binding Strength: Difference between revisions

From NARS2000
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 47: Line 47:


* A dyadic operator written as <apll>&hellip; dop 1 2 3</apll> is interpreted as having a right operand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>1</apll> and a right argument of <apll>2 3</apll>.
* A dyadic operator written as <apll>&hellip; dop 1 2 3</apll> is interpreted as having a right operand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>1</apll> and a right argument of <apll>2 3</apll>.
* A hyperator written as <apll>1 2 3 mhmo</apll> is interpreted as having a left hyperand ('''short''' left scope) of <apll>3</apll> and a left operand ('''long''' left scope) of <apll>1 2</apll>.
* A hyperator written as either <apll>1 2 3 mhmo</apll> or <apll>1 2 3 mhdo &hellip;</apll> is interpreted as having a left hyperand ('''short''' left scope) of <apll>3</apll> and a left operand ('''long''' left scope) of <apll>1 2</apll>.
* A dyadic hyperator written as <apll>&hellip; dhmo 1 2 3</apll> is interpreted as having a right hyperand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>1</apll> and a right argument of <apll>2 3</apll>.
* A dyadic hyperator written as <apll>&hellip; dhmo 1 2 3</apll> is interpreted as having a right hyperand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>1</apll> and a right argument of <apll>2 3</apll>.
* A dyadic hyperator written as <apll>&hellip; dhdo 1 2 3</apll> is interpreted as having a right hyperand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>1</apll>, a right operand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>2</apll>, and a right argument of <apll>3</apll>.
* A dyadic hyperator written as <apll>&hellip; dhdo 1 2 3</apll> is interpreted as having a right hyperand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>1</apll>, a right operand ('''short''' right scope) of <apll>2</apll>, and a right argument of <apll>3</apll>.


To reduce confusion, use parentheses such as <apll>(LO (LH dhdo 1) 2) 3</apll>.
To reduce confusion, use parentheses such as <apll>(LO (LH dhdo 1) 2) 3</apll>.
Abbreviations:
* <apll>dop</apll> Dyadic Operator
* <apll>mhmo</apll> Monadic Hyperand Monadic Operand Hyperator
* <apll>mhdo</apll> Monadic Hyperand Dyadic Operand ...
* <apll>dhmo</apll> Dyadic Hyperand Monadic Operand ...
* <apll>dhdo</apll> Dyadic Hyperand Dyadic Operand ...

Revision as of 14:54, 22 March 2019

Table

The rules for how Variables, Functions, Operators, Hyperators and other syntactic elements combine are covered in the following table:

# Category Description Example
12: Brackets left Brackets to what is on their left "? […]"
11: Specification left Left arrow to what is on its left "? ←"
10: Right hyperand, right operand Dyadic hyperator to its right hyperand "HYP ?"
9: Right hyperand, left operand Dyadic hyperator to its right hyperand "HYP ?"
8: Left hyperand, right operand Hyperator to its left hyperand "? HYP"
7: Left hyperand, left operand Hyperator to its left hyperand "? HYP"
6: Right operand Dyadic operator to its right operand "DOP ?"
5: Vector notation Array to an array "A A"
4: Left operand Operator to its left operand "? MOP"
4: Train right Train to its right paren "… F)"
3: Train left Train to its left paren "(F …"
3: Left argument Function to its left argument "A F"
2: Right argument Function to its right argument "F A"
1: Specification right Left arrow to what is on its right "← ?"
0: Brackets right Brackets to what is on their right "[…] ?"

One way to look at these rules is that if you are given three names and/or symbols, you can always tell whether the middle object binds to the left or right object.

Vector Notation

As the above table indicates, Vector Notation has a lower Binding Strength than both a right operand to its operator and either hyperand to its hyperator. One consequence of this is a change introduced in NARS2000 Version 0.5.10 w.r.t. Numeric Strands. In particular,

  • A dyadic operator written as … dop 1 2 3 is interpreted as having a right operand (short right scope) of 1 and a right argument of 2 3.
  • A hyperator written as either 1 2 3 mhmo or 1 2 3 mhdo … is interpreted as having a left hyperand (short left scope) of 3 and a left operand (long left scope) of 1 2.
  • A dyadic hyperator written as … dhmo 1 2 3 is interpreted as having a right hyperand (short right scope) of 1 and a right argument of 2 3.
  • A dyadic hyperator written as … dhdo 1 2 3 is interpreted as having a right hyperand (short right scope) of 1, a right operand (short right scope) of 2, and a right argument of 3.

To reduce confusion, use parentheses such as (LO (LH dhdo 1) 2) 3.

Abbreviations:

  • dop Dyadic Operator
  • mhmo Monadic Hyperand Monadic Operand Hyperator
  • mhdo Monadic Hyperand Dyadic Operand ...
  • dhmo Dyadic Hyperand Monadic Operand ...
  • dhdo Dyadic Hyperand Dyadic Operand ...