Array Predicates: Difference between revisions
Sudleyplace (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sudleyplace (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Permutation Vectors == | == Permutation Vectors == | ||
In this case, index generator (<apll>⍳R</apll>) produces a Permutation Vector, as does deal ( | In this case, index generator (<apll>⍳R</apll>) produces a Permutation Vector, as does deal (<apll>L?R</apll>) when the left and right arguments are the same — the results of these primitives are marked internally as Permutation Vectors. Subsequent use of such arrays maintains that property when operated on by rotate/reversal and grade up/down. Moreover, the two grade (<apll>⍋PV</apll> and <apll>⍒PV</apll>) and the index of (<apll>PV⍳R</apll>) primitives use a much faster (linear) algorithm than they would normally use when the appropriate argument is a Permutation Vector. |
Revision as of 14:43, 18 August 2008
This clever idea of Bob Bernecky's [1] provides a performance improvement for certain expressions by marking certain arrays with special properties. For example, a permutation vector [2] has the property that it is invariant under various APL primitives such as rotate/reversal (L⌽R and ⌽R) and grade up/down (⍋R and ⍒R).
Bernecky has defined several array predicate properties, one of which has been implemented in NARS so far.
Permutation Vectors
In this case, index generator (⍳R) produces a Permutation Vector, as does deal (L?R) when the left and right arguments are the same — the results of these primitives are marked internally as Permutation Vectors. Subsequent use of such arrays maintains that property when operated on by rotate/reversal and grade up/down. Moreover, the two grade (⍋PV and ⍒PV) and the index of (PV⍳R) primitives use a much faster (linear) algorithm than they would normally use when the appropriate argument is a Permutation Vector.