Talk:Unicode: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
It's a bit reductive to say that "UTF-16 is needed mostly for Far Eastern languages" in the sense that the BMP contains the basic characters for Far Eastern languages. The other planes are concerned with anciant scripts (egyptian hyeroglyphs, phoenician, cuneiform but also western and byzantine music and ''extensions'' of chinese characters). | It's a bit reductive to say that "UTF-16 is needed mostly for Far Eastern languages" in the sense that the BMP contains the basic characters for Far Eastern languages. The other planes are concerned with anciant scripts (egyptian hyeroglyphs, phoenician, cuneiform but also western and byzantine music and ''extensions'' of chinese characters). | ||
== Alphabet for Names == | |||
Historically, the first implementation of APL used a ''Selectric'' typeball as input device. There was only one form of alphabet made of the uppercase letters [A-Z]. I do'nt remember exactly who had the idea of underlining the letters (perhaps Adin Falkoff) but the intention was clearly to have an ''emphatic'' set of characters in opposite of the standard one. | |||
Then, in my humble opinion, the mapping is '''non-emphatic/lowercase''' and '''emphatic/uppercase''' because uppercase letters seems stronger than lowercase ones. | |||
Revision as of 22:24, 20 March 2009
Character Array and Name Storage
It is true that "UCS-2 represents characters from U+0000 through U+FFFF; UTF-16 represents characters from U+0000 through U+10FFFF" but only UCS-2 excludes the surrogate pair range of U+D800 through U+DFFF (2,048 characters). UTF-16 uses precisely these surrogate pairs to represent the characters outside the Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP).
It's a bit reductive to say that "UTF-16 is needed mostly for Far Eastern languages" in the sense that the BMP contains the basic characters for Far Eastern languages. The other planes are concerned with anciant scripts (egyptian hyeroglyphs, phoenician, cuneiform but also western and byzantine music and extensions of chinese characters).
Alphabet for Names
Historically, the first implementation of APL used a Selectric typeball as input device. There was only one form of alphabet made of the uppercase letters [A-Z]. I do'nt remember exactly who had the idea of underlining the letters (perhaps Adin Falkoff) but the intention was clearly to have an emphatic set of characters in opposite of the standard one.
Then, in my humble opinion, the mapping is non-emphatic/lowercase and emphatic/uppercase because uppercase letters seems stronger than lowercase ones.
